|

BOOK
EXCERPT Dry Eye: A Practical Guide to
Ocular Surface Disorders and Stem Cell Surgery Amar Agarwal MS, FRCS, FRCOphth
Chapter
15 Punctal Occlusion: Plugs, Cautery,
and Suturing Sanjay V. Patel, MD and H. Kaz Soong, MD
INTRODUCTION
Therapeutic occlusion of the lacrimal canalicular system was
first performed in 1877 to seal off the lacrimal sac from the ocular surface in
patients with infectious dacryocystitis.1 It was not until the 1890s that
therapeutic punctal occlusion was used to prevent the drainage of tears in
patients with xerophthalmus.24 This simple procedure is the
most common surgical treatment of dry eye today and is indispensable in the
management of tear insufficiency associated with KCS, GVHD, Sjögrens
syndrome, neurotrophic and exposure keratitides, cicatricial conjunctivitis,
postLASIK dry eyes, and SLK.5 The lacrimal puncta can be
occluded by thermal methods, by implantation of plugs, or with more complex
surgical methods requiring incisions and sutures.
Punctal and canalicular closure increases mainly the aqueous
component of natural tears, but also has secondary beneficial effects on goblet
cell density, tear film stability, and tear osmolality.68 The
procedure also increases the retention of artificial tears. Objective and
subjective signs and symptoms of xerophthalmus are both improved. This, in
turn, results in improved visual acuity, reduced punctate staining of the
ocular surface, diminished mucous discharge, relief from foreign body
sensation, improved tolerance of contact lenses, and reduction in the frequency
of artificial tears.
The procedure is associated with very few complications.
These include epiphora, spontaneous reopening of the punctum, canaliculitis,
dacryocystitis,9 and toxic medicamentosus (from increased retention
of topical medications).10 Additionally, complications unique to
punctal and canalicular plugs include abrasion of the ocular surface by the
exposed ends of the implants,8,11 pruritus,10,12
dacryocystitis (from the migration of plugs into the common
canaliculus),13 pyogenic granuloma,13 and extrusion.
Although upper and lower canaliculi have very similar
drainage capabilities, the inferior canaliculi may have slightly more
activity.14 Closure of one canaliculus may not necessarily translate
to a 50% improvement in objective and subjective measures because the
unoccluded side may increase its drainage activity in response.
THERMAL OCCLUSION
AND LASER PHOTOCOAGULATION
Thermal punctal and canalicular occlusion may be performed
with a hot cautery, diathermy, or argon laser to cause destruction, shrinkage,
and scarring of the punctal opening and the wall of the proximal lumen. Thermal
cautery is the oldest technique, dating back to the late 1800s,1 and
is simpler, quicker, and less costly than diathermy or laser photocoagulation.
It is currently the most common method of thermal punctal occlusion.
|
 Figure 15-1. Punctal occlusion with hand-held,
battery-operated thermal cautery. |
|
The hot cautery method utilizes the direct transmission of
heat from a hot probe to produce a controlled burn injury to the punctal
opening. It is most frequently performed with a battery-operated unit with an
electrically-heated nichrome wire tip (galvanocautery) (Figure 15-1), although
wall-current units are also available. In some parts of the world, punctal
cauterization is still performed with a hot needle heated with an alcohol lamp.
Although low temperature cauterization may provide better control of tissue
destruction, some surgeons prefer higher temperatures to produce deeper
scarring and shrinkage for longer-lasting results. The procedure is performed
in the outpatient clinic under local infiltrative anesthesia with a lidocaine
injection into the tissues surrounding the punctum. Cauterization may be
performed at the slit lamp, under an operating microscope, or with magnifying
loupes. It is important to treat not only the surface of the punctum, but to
also insert the tip of the cautery gently into the proximal lumen to achieve a
more effective and permanent closure. In many successful occlusions, a clear
membrane eventually covers the surface of the punctal opening. In cases of late
punctal occlusion failure, the wall of the canalicular lumen becomes
re-epithelialized through the normal reparative process of cell migration.
Temporary tissue edema postoperatively may sometimes functionally obstruct the
punctum and canaliculus, but with resolution of the edema, the channel may
reopen.
|
 Figure 15-2. Laser punctal occlusion. Argon laser spot
(gray circle) pattern at and around central punctal opening (black circle).
|
|
Diathermy utilizes radiofrequency (455 kHz to 100 mHz)
energy to heat the tissues in the area of the punctal opening and proximal
lumen. Some diathermy units employ a second electrode on the patients
torso or limb to complete the electrical circuit. In others, the electrodes are
placed in close proximity to each other (eg, bipolar pencil or forceps-style
cautery tips), thus negating the need for a remote, second electrode pad. The
diathermy procedure is performed under local infiltrative anesthesia. A
fine-needle electrode is introduced into the canaliculus through the punctum
and the electromagnetic current is activated until the surrounding tissues
blanch and contract. Available commercial diathermy units include the
Hyfrecator (ConMed Corp, Utica, NY), Mentor Diathermy (Mentor Ophthalmics,
Santa Barbara, Calif), and Surgitron (Ellman International, Oceanside, NY).
Argon laser photocoagulation for punctal
occlusion15,16 may be done under either topical or local anesthesia.
After the punctal opening is first encircled with laser spots, additional spots
are then delivered into the punctum itself (Figure 15-2). Laser treatment on
average has a shorter duration of effect compared to thermal
cautery.16,17
If the patient experiences significant epiphora after any of
the aforementioned thermal punctal occlusion methods, the obstruction may be
reversed in some cases by using a punctal dilator to probe and dilate the
punctal opening and the proximal canaliculus.9 If this fails, more
invasive methods, such as passage of a pigtail probe, incision of the eyelid
margin medial to the punctum with marsupialization of the canaliculus, or (in
extremely rare instances) a full dacryocystorhinostomy, may become necessary.
PUNCTAL OBSTRUCTION
The lacrimal punctum and canaliculus may be occluded
temporarily or permanently with tissue glue or implanted foreign bodies.
Temporary occlusive procedures are useful in assessing the beneficial effects
of lacrimal obstruction prior to resorting to permanent occlusion.
PUNCTAL OBSTRUCTION
WITH GLUE
Cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive may be applied to the punctal
opening or into the proximal canaliculus, using a 25- to 27-gauge cannula or
needle.7,18 A new fibrin surgical glue (Tisseel VH, Baxter
Healthcare, Deerfield, Ill) is now available and may possibly be used as an
alternative to cyanoacrylate adhesive. Typically, occlusion with glue lasts
only several days to week because the epithelial cells lining the punctal
opening and the walls of the proximal lumen slough during the natural
cell-turnover cycle.
PUNCTAL OBSTRUCTION
WITH ABSORBABLE IMPLANTS
|
 Figure 15-3. Insertion of absorbable collagen
canalicular implant with jewelers forceps. (Courtesy of Medennium, Inc,
Irvine, Calif.) |
|
Although most absorbable implants are made of
collagen, other absorbable materials are also available. Collagen implants are
inserted into the canaliculus and typically degrade over 3 to 7
days,19 although total degradation may take as long as 14
days.20 These implants may be inserted to temporarily enhance the
retention of the ocular surface tear film, thus permitting the clinician to
assess whether or not permanent occlusion might improve subjective comfort and
objective clinical findings. If epiphora results, permanent occlusion with
nonabsorbable canalicular implants, thermal methods, or suture techniques would
be contraindicated.
Implantation of absorbable plugs may be performed with or
without topical anesthesia. Small punctal openings may require dilation before
insertion of plugs, but care should be taken to not excessively dilate and
damage the fibrous ring surrounding the punctal opening. Plugs are inserted
with toothless pincers, such as the jewelers forceps (Figure 15-3). The
insertion may be facilitated by gentle lateral traction on the eyelid.
Absorbable collagen punctal plugs and canalicular implants are available from
Alcon Laboratories (Fort Worth, Tex), Ciba Vision (Atlanta, Ga), FCI
Ophthalmics (Marshfield Hills, Mass), Lacrimedics (Eastsound, Wash), and Oasis
Products (Glendora, Calif).
Catgut (20) or chromic catgut (40) sutures are
absorbable materials (collagen matrix) that can be used instead of collagen
plugs. Any desired length of suture may be cut and inserted into the
canaliculus. This inexpensive material is used by some surgeons to temporarily
enhance the tear film in the immediate postoperative phase after corneal
surgery.
PUNCTAL OBSTRUCTION
WITH NONABSORBABLE IMPLANTS
AND PLUGS
Nonabsorbable implant materials include polyethylene,
silicone, and acrylic. Silicone and polyethylene implants are made in a variety
of shapes and sizes to facilitate insertion, prevent extrusion, and inhibit
distal migration. The implant shape may determine whether the punctum is
partially or completely occluded. Silicone and polyethylene implants are
generally safe and effective. Although they are considered
permanent, they are usually removable with varying degrees of
difficulty.21
Insertion of silicone and polyethylene plugs is performed
with or without topical anesthesia and magnification (Figure 15-4). Punctal
dilation is typically required before insertion. The implants are typically
preloaded on an inserter for direct placement into the punctal orifice. Gentle
horizontal eyelid traction helps evert the punctum to facilitate insertion.
When the shaft of the implant is located in the vertical portion of the
canaliculus and the head (flange) of the implant protrudes above the punctum,
the implant is released from the inserter. Some inserters have a built-in
button to release the implants, while others require forceps to hold the
implant in position while the inserter is withdrawn. This type of punctal plug
implant is visible under slit lamp biomicroscopy and can readily be removed
with jewelers forceps.
|
 Figure 15-4. Nonabsorbable punctal plugs with flange to
prevent distal migration. Punctal dilation (A), plug insertion (B), and
different size plugs (C). |
A newer, nonabsorbable implant made from hydrophobic acrylic
(SmartPlug, Medennium Inc, Irvine, Calif) is now available. This material is
heat responsive and its physical dimensions undergo transition from 9.0 x 0.4
mm to 2.0 x 1.0 mm at temperatures above 32°C. No sizing of the punctal
opening is required because one plug size fits all puncta before heat
activation. Insertion may be done with or without topical anesthesia and
magnification. The implant is inserted approximately two-thirds of its length
into the canaliculus with special SmartPlug forceps. The implant retracts
itself into the canaliculus as the heat-activated conformational change pulls
it distally. As the implant molds to the dimensions of the vertical
canaliculus, the exposed portion retracts completely into the punctum. The
SmartPlug is not visible once it attains its final position.
Removing the SmartPlug requires grasping the implant at the
punctal orifice with jewelers forceps if it is visible or flushing the
implant distally into the lacrimal sac with saline solution. Other companies in
the United States (Form Fit, Oasis Products, Glendora, Calif) and Japan have
now developed similar heat-sensitive plugs. Recurrent extrusion of flanged
surface punctal plugs may be an indication for switching to these
heat-sensitive implants or to thermal occlusion.
PUNCTAL AND
CANALICULAR IMPLANT INFECTIONS
AND INFLAMMATION
Serious but rare complications of both punctal plugs and
canalicular implants include canaliculitis (infectious or noninfectious) and
implant migration.22 Initial treatment of the former requires
systemic antibiotics, irrigation of the canaliculus, and drainage of
suppurative material; however, recurrences after the initial episode are very
common. Surgical removal of the implant via an incision through the palpebral
conjunctiva into the canaliculus or a full dacryocystorhinostomy may be
necessary in recalcitrant cases. Distal implant migration may occur
spontaneously or following forceful insertion. Diagnosis may be aided by
checking for canalicular patency with punctal irrigation and by ultrasound
biomicroscopy.23 Initial management of implant intrusion involves
observation, but if the implant causes complications, canalicular surgery or
dacryocystorhinostomy would be warranted to remove the problematic
implant.22 Punctal surface implants with inserter holes may collect
debris that may become colonized with microorganisms. Rarely, tear stasis from
the punctal obstruction may predispose the patient to ocular
infection.24
PUNCTAL OCCLUSION
TECHNIQUES REQUIRING SUTURE
AND INCISIONS
If punctal occlusion fails multiple times, it may become
necessary to resort to more extensive surgical procedures that involve suturing
and incision. These procedures are more time consuming and may commensurately
be associated with greater surgical morbidity and complications.
The punctum may be occluded first with a hot cautery and
then sutured shut with a single nylon stitch. Alternatively, the vertical
canaliculus may be sutured shut with a single 80 polyglactin
full-thickness eyelid mattress suture tied on the skin side. If desired, these
techniques can also be combined with nonthermal punctal epithelial debridement.
A more extensive procedure employs surgical laceration of the horizontal
canaliculus medial to the punctum on the eyelid margin, thermal cauterization
of the exposed canalicular and punctal surfaces, and suture closure of both the
canaliculus and punctum (Figure 15-5).25 Complete canalicular
excision is a rarely performed procedure in which the canaliculus is identified
with a probe and extirpated through either a lid margin or palpebral
conjunctival incision.26 The operation is associated with a risk of
eyelid distortion and is best performed by a surgeon experienced in canalicular
and cosmetic eyelid procedures.
|
 Figure 15-5. Incisional punctal occlusion. Thermally
cauterized punctum is incorporated into blade incision, which is then closed
with sutures. |
A medial tarsorrhaphy procedure can be modified to
incorporate simultaneous occlusion of the upper and lower puncta.27
In this technique, a rectangle of epithelial tissue is removed from around both
the upper and lower puncta. The denuded surfaces of the medial eyelid margins
are approximated with 80 polyglactin sutures, resulting in occlusion of
both puncta. A standard medial temporary tarsorrhaphy is then performed with a
mattress suture over protective bolsters. This procedure is ideal for patients
with severe tear deficiency and in cases of severe neurotrophic or exposure
keratitis.
There are several less complicated surgical techniques that
are also more readily reversible.27 A bulbar conjunctival autograft
taken from one of the fornices can be sutured as a patch over the punctal
orifice after a similar sheet of epithelial tissue surrounding the punctum is
excised. The patch graft is secured with 4 polyglactin (80) or nylon
(100) sutures (the latter are removed after 1 week). The procedure may be
reversed by simply removing the tissue patch. Another technique is the
translocation of the punctal orifice away from the tear lake. The vertical
canaliculus is identified with a probe and moved anteriorly through the
anterior lamellae of the eyelid, in effect moving the punctal orifice to the
eyelash line. Reversal involves translocation of the punctum back to its
original position.
CONCLUSION
Punctal occlusion is a very effective invasive method of
treating dry eye and other ocular surface disorders. Methods of occlusion
include tamponade by implants, as well as thermal and surgical occlusion. In
general, the latter methods should be reserved for severe cases of tear
deficiency.
Key
Points
- Punctal and canalicular closure increases mainly
the aqueous component of natural tears but also has secondary beneficial
effects on goblet cell density, tear-film stability, and tear osmolality. The
procedure also increases the retention of artificial tears.
- The procedure is associated with very few
complications. These include epiphora, spontaneous reopening of the punctum,
canaliculitis, dacryocystitis, and toxic medicamentosus (from increased
retention of topical medications).
- Thermal punctal and canalicular occlusion may be
performed with a hot cautery, diathermy, or argon laser to cause destruction,
shrinkage, and scarring of the punctal opening and the wall of the proximal
lumen.
- The lacrimal punctum and canaliculus may be
occluded temporarily or permanently with tissue glue or implanted foreign
bodies.
- Serious but rare complications of both punctal
plugs and canalicular implants include canaliculitis (infectious or
noninfectious) and implant migration.
- If punctal occlusion fails multiple times, it may
become necessary to resort to more extensive surgical procedures that involve
suturing and incision.
|
REFERENCES
- Panas F, Chamoin É. Leçons sur les
affections de lappareil lachrymal comprenant la glande lacrymale et les
voies dexcrétion des larmes. Paris: Delahaye et Cie;
1877:168169.
- Römer P. Experimentelle untersuchungen über
Infektionen vom Konjunktivalsack. Zeitschr Hygiene.
1899;32:295326.
- Záboj-Bruckner A. Lacrymal passages in the
guinea-pig and rabbit. Br J Ophthalmol. 1924; 8:158165.
- Beetham WP. Filamentary keratitis. Tr Am Ophthalmol
Soc. 1935;33:413435.
- Yang HY, Fujishima H, Toda I, et al. Lacrimal punctal
occlusion for the treatment of superior limbic keratoconjunctivitis. Am J
Ophthalmol. 1997;124:8087.
- Fayet B, Bernard JA, Ammar J, et al. Traitement des
sécheresses lacrymales par occlusion réversible des méats
lacrymaux. Résultats comparés à un groupe témoin. J
Fr Ophtalmol. 1990;13:123133.
- Turss R, Adolf HJ. Vorübergehender verschlub der
tränenkanälchen mit gewebekleber. Forsch Oftalmol.
1982;79:266269.
- Willis RM, Folberg R, Krachmer JH, Holland EJ. The
treatment of aqueous-deficient dry eye with removable punctal plugs. A clinical
and impression-cytologic study. Ophthalmology. 1987;
94:514518.
- Glatt HJ. Acute dacryocystitis after punctal occlusion
for keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Am J Ophthalmol.
1991;111:769770.
- Huang TC, Lee DA. Punctal occlusion and topical
medications for glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1989;107:151155.
- Nelson CC. Complications of Freeman plugs. Arch
Ophthalmol. 1991;109:923924.
- Fayet B, Bernard JA. Tolérance et complications
des bouchons lacrymaux. Bull Soc Belg Ophtalmol.
1990;238:5356.
- Fayet B, Bernard JA, Ammar J, et al. Complications des
bouchons lacrymaux employés dans le traitement symptomatique des
sécheresses oculaires. J Fr Ophtalmol.
1990;13:135142.
- Ogut MS, Bavbek T, Kazokoglu H. Assessment of tear
drainage by fluorescein dye disappearance test after experimental canalicular
obstruction. Acta Ophtalmologica. 1993;71:6972.
- Benson DR, Hemmady PB, Snyder RW. Efficacy of laser
punctal occlusion. Ophthalmology. 1992;99:618621.
- Vrabec MP, Elsing SH, Aitken PA. A prospective,
randomized comparison of thermal cautery and argon laser for permanent punctal
occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 1993;116:469471.
- Beisel JG. Treatment of dry eye with punctal plugs.
Optom Clin. 1991;1:103117.
- Köhler U. Komplikationen nach vorübergegendem
trännennasenwegverschlub mit Gewebekleber (Histoacryl). Klin
Monatsbl Augenheilkd. 1986;189:486490.
- Herrick RS. A subjective approach to the treatment of dry
eye syndrome. In: Sullivan DA, ed. Lacrimal Gland, Tear Film, and Dry Eye
Syndromes. New York: Plenum Press; 1994.
- Lamberts D. Punctal occlusion. Int Ophthalmol
Clin. 1987;27:4446.
- Tai MC, Cosar CB, Cohen EJ, et al. The clinical efficacy
of silicone punctal plug therapy. Cornea. 2002;21:135139.
- Sopakar CNS, Patrinely JR, Junts J, et al. The perils of
permanent punctal plugs. Am J Ophthalmol. 1997;123:120121.
- Hurwitz JJ, Pavlin CJ, Rhemtulla el K. Identification of
retained intracanalicular plugs with ultrasound biomicroscopy. Can J
Ophthalmol. 2004;39:533537.
- Yokoi N, Okada K, Sugita J, Kinoshita S. Acute
conjunctivitis associated with biofilm formation on a punctal plug. Jap J
Ophthalmol. 2000;44:559560.
- Frueh BR. Exposure keratitis. In: Waltman SR, Keates RH,
Hoyt CS, eds. Surgery of the Eye. New York: Churchill Livingstone;
1988.
- Putterman AM. Canaliculectomy in the treatment of
keratitis sicca. Ophthalmic Surg. 1991;22:478480.
- Murube J, Murube E. Treatment of dry eye by blocking the
lacrimal canaliculi. Surv Ophthalmol. 1996;40:463480.
 |