|

BOOK
EXCERPT Phaco Chop: Mastering Techniques,
Optimizing Technology, and Avoiding Complications David F. Chang, MD
CHAPTER
13 Pearls for Hydrodissection and
Hydrodelineation David F. Chang,
MD
The topic of hydrodissection receives relatively little attention
compared to phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion
techniques. It may therefore be the most underrated step of modern cataract
surgery. A properly developed hydrodissection fluid wave should hug the
internal capsular surface as it travels behind the nucleus.1,2
(Figures 13-1A through C). The subsequent hydrodelineation wave propagates
along a more internal plane that cleaves the epinucleus apart from the
endonucleus2,3 (Figure 13-1D).
There are three important objectives for hydrodissection. First,
because the phaco tip is confined to one location, nuclear rotation is integral
to every phaco technique. Effective hydrodissection allows the nucleus to
rotate without placing undue stress on the zonules. As a second benefit, the
hydrodissection wave should loosen and facilitate removal of the epinuclear
shell. Even following hydrodelineation, a loosened epinucleus will initially
rotate together with the endonucleus. Once the latter is removed, the
epinucleus can be more readily mobilized, spun, and flipped if its capsular
attachments have been cleaved (Figure 13-2). Finally, the hydrodissection wave
should shear the cortical-capsular attachments making cortical aspiration
safer, faster, and more complete.1,2,4-6
There are several pearls that can help surgeons to consistently
achieve these three important goals.
Pearl #1: Decompress the
Anterior Chamber Before Starting
A common mistake is to initiate hydrodissection while the anterior
chamber is over-inflated with viscoelastic. Hydrodissection is easier if the
eye is somewhat soft and if the anterior chamber has been partially emptied. Of
course, this condition is at odds with the preceding capsulorrhexis step during
which an abundant amount of viscoelastic is desirable.
Using viscoelastic to deepen the chamber and flatten the anterior
capsular convexity makes it easier to control the capsulorrhexis tear. As
discussed in Chapter 12, if the chamber shallows, the risk of a peripheral
radial tear increases. However, by exerting downward pressure against the
nucleus, overfilling the anterior chamber with viscoelastic also increases the
resistance that a posteriorly directed hydrodissection wave must overcome. By
limiting the escape of injected fluid through the incision, this situation can
also lead to excessive deepening of the anterior chamber during the
hydrodissection injection. It is therefore advisable to burp out
some viscoelastic immediately prior to initiating hydrodissection. This can be
accomplished by gently pressing the shaft of the hydrodissection cannula
against the incision floor prior to the injection. Partially emptying the
anterior chamber in this way will permit the nucleus to more readily separate
and elevate away from the posterior capsule.
Pearl #2: Use Adequate
Injection Force
For the wave to propagate posteriorly and shear the natural
epinuclear-capsular adhesions, a sufficient hydrostatic force must be
generated. However, fear of blowing out the capsule causes many
novice surgeons to be overly timid with the injection pressure. Because the
volume of fluid that can be injected into the anterior chamber is limited, the
most effective fluid jet is one that is brief, sufficiently forceful, and
radially directed. The resulting hydrostatic force is proportional to the rate
of flow and the cannula resistance. Either a 30- or 27-gauge cannula (see
Figure 13-1A) provides enough resistance to generate the necessary force with a
small volume of fluid. Since tuberculin syringes hold insufficient volume, the
preferred syringe size is 3.0-milliliters (mL). In contrast to larger syringes,
this size is small enough to provide good tactile feedback as the plunger is
advanced regarding the rate of flow.
Pearl #3: Avoid
Capsular-Lenticular Block
Although it is possible to rupture the posterior capsule with
hydrodissection, nuclear-capsular block is usually a
prerequisite.7-11 As a dense nucleus elevates, it may completely
seal off the capsulorrhexis opening from below. If fluid cannot escape the
capsular bag, continued infusion can over-inflate the bag enough to rupture the
posterior capsule.11 The surgeon may not be aware of this
complication until the phaco tip is inserted. At this point, the hydrostatic
pressure will expand the capsular rent, and the nucleus will drop before or
during the initial sculpting strokes. To avoid this complication, one should
terminate the injection as soon as a brunescent nucleus pops up.
The surgeon must resist the temptation to continue injecting until the
hydrodissection wave has completely crossed behind the nucleus. Instead, one
should stop and reposit the nucleus posteriorlythus breaking the
nuclear-capsular blockbefore continuing with further hydrodissection or
hydrodelineation.
Pearl #4: Achieve Cortical
Cleaving Hydrodissection
Howard Fine has described the concept of cortical cleaving
hydrodissection whereby the cortex is loosened by the fluid wave.1
This is facilitated by tenting the anterior capsule slightly upward with the
cannula tip in order to direct the fluid stream along the inside contour of the
capsular bag (see Figure 13-1A). A wave that hugs the inner capsular surface
will produce a slow advancing fluid front with scalloped edges (see Figures
13-1B and C and Figures 13-3 A and B). These characteristics indicate the
resistance that is encountered as the wave shears through the cortical-capsular
adhesions, and confirm that all three hydrodissection goals have been achieved.
Some surgeons advise leaving ones thumb off the plunger until the cannula
tip is positioned properly. Otherwise, if even a tiny amount of fluid is
trickling out, it may prevent the tip from properly tenting up the anterior
capsule just prior to the definitive injection.
|

 Figure 13-3. (A and B) Additional examples of
the scalloped leading edge of the hydrodissection wave. Using a right-angled
cannula preferentially loosens the subincisional cortex. |
If the wave propagated so quickly that the surgeon could not
observe an advancing edge, it probably traveled along too internal an anatomic
plane. A rapid, instantaneous wave without any resistance usually signifies
hydrodelineation instead of hydrodissection (see Figure 13-1D). This error
occurs more frequently in softer lenses where the epinucleus is proportionately
larger. Without hydrodissection, hydrodelineation alone will permit the
endonucleus to rotate within a stationery epinuclear shell, but will not loosen
the epinucleus and cortex. The adherent epinucleus will subsequently be
difficult to aspirate, mobilize, or flip as a unit.
Because either hydrodissection or hydrodelineation alone will
permit rotation of a moderately dense endonucleus, proper hydrodissection
cannot be confirmed until the epinucleus and cortex are removed. In order to
flip the epinuclear shell, it is much safer to aspirate the anterior shelf
rather than the posterior portion lying in contact with the posterior capsule.
If the anterior shelf breaks off as it is being aspirated, the surgeon can
rotate the loosened epinucleus counterclockwise with the microfinger to bring a
fresh anterior shelf to the contraincisional quadrant. In contrast, an adherent
epinucleus neither rotates nor flips, and the distally aspirated anterior shelf
eventually breaks off. This leaves a proximal adherent remnant with nothing to
grab onto, and increases the risk of aspirating or tearing the posterior
capsule with the phaco tip.
|

Figure 13-4. Cortical aspiration with the phaco tip following
cortical-cleaving hydrodissection, as described by Howard Fine. |
Fine described using cortical cleaving hydrodissection to permit
cortical aspiration with the phaco tip1 (Figure 13-4). However, even
if this maneuver is not attempted, loosening the capsular attachments benefits
conventional automated cortical cleanup. For example, a mailing label easily
separates in one piece from its waxed paper backing. However, once applied to a
cardboard box, it becomes difficult to remove as a single piece. After one
strip prematurely shreds and breaks off, one must again struggle to regrasp a
new area. The difference in these situations is in the strength of the
adhesion. The tendency for hydrodissected cortex to separate easily in sheets,
as opposed to small adherent strips, is particularly advantageous in the
subincisional area4,5 (see Figure 7-8). Again, the more adherent the
cortex, the greater the risk of aspirating or rupturing the posterior capsule
becomes.
Pearl #5: Initiate the Wave
Proximally
The hydrodissection wave frequently fails to travel completely
across the posterior capsule. When a conventional straight cannula is used, a
partially completed wave that started from the contraincisional fornix may not
adequately loosen the subincisional cortex. The importance of preferentially
loosening subincisional cortex means that the hydrodissection wave should
ideally commence from the subincisional anterior capsular rim. For this reason,
this author advocates using a right angle hydrodissection cannula tip. Like a
right-angle I/A tip, this configuration can access the proximal 180 degrees of
anterior capsular rim (see Figures 13-3A and B). On the other hand, a straight
cannula can only access the distal 135 degrees of capsular rim, and a J-shaped
cannula is limited to the subincisional 90 degrees of capsular rim.
Pearl #6: Rotate the Nucleus
With the Cannula
Another helpful hint is to sever the last remaining endonuclear
and epinuclearcapsular attachments by using the cannula tip to rotate the
nucleus within the bag prior to phaco. The previously mentioned right angle tip
works well at engaging the peripheral anterior nuclear surface and rotating it
with circular raking motions (see Figures 13-1E through G). By not having to
remove the tip, the surgeon can readily repeat the hydrodissection step if
necessary.
Technique Using a Right
Angle Hydrodissection Cannula
The Chang hydrodissection cannula (Katena; Mastel Precision,
Rapid City, SD; and Rhein Medical, Tampa, Fla.) (Figure 13-5) is a reusable,
27-gauge cannula with a short, 1.0-mm right- angled tip. The very end has been
flattened to create a slightly fan-shaped fluid stream, and to more snugly
nestle beneath the proximal anterior capsular rim. A disposable version is
manufactured by Oasis Medical Inc (Glendora, Calif). Hydrodissection success is
determined more by technique than by instrumentation. Nevertheless, the small
right angle design of this cannula provides several ergonomic advantages.
|
 Figure
13-5. Chang hydrodissection cannulae. Shorter tip model on left; longer
tip model on right. (Courtesy of Katena.) |
By angling the shaft within the tunneled incision, one can
position the 1.0-mm cannula tip just underneath the proximal capsulorrhexis
edgeeither slightly left or right of the incision (see Figure 13-1A).
This preferentially loosens the subincisional cortex. A right-angled I/A tip
configuration provides better access for subincisional cortex for the same
reason.
The 1.0-mm long tip is small enough to flip around while still
inside the anterior chamber. This allows one to sequentially hydrodissect or
hydrodelineate both lateral quadrants without having to re-insert the
instrument.
Because of the tips 90-degree bend, rotating it along the
axis of the shaft can angle the tip so that it points either slightly above or
below the plane of the capsulorrhexis. By initially angling it slightly upward,
the undersurface of the anterior capsule is tented. This forces the ensuing
hydrodissection wave to hug the inside contour of the capsule. By next angling
it slightly downward, the tip rotates into a more internally directed cleavage
plane for hydrodelineation (Figures 13-6A through C).
Used like a hook or a pick, the short right-angled tip can spin
the nucleus by engaging its anterior surface peripherally and exerting a
rotational motion (see Figures 13-1E through G). This repetitive raking motion
manually shears the remaining capsular adhesions and confirms successful
nuclear rotation. The Chang cannula has a dull point at the tip to further
facilitate this maneuver. If the nucleus wont rotate, the cannula is
repositioned for additional hydrodissection attempts.
The right angle design keeps the shaft out of the way as fluid is
injected behind the nucleus. This can facilitate efforts to prolapse one pole
of the endonucleus through the capsulorrhexis and out of the capsular bag. This
maneuver can be used in supracapsular flip techniques or for manual small
incision ECCE.12
Conclusion
Because surgeons are limited to a single incision in
phacoemulsification, cortical cleaving hydrodissection greatly facilitates
removal of the nucleus, epinucleus, and cortex. Absent rotation, one cannot as
safely remove subincisional nucleus and epinucleus. Overly adherent
subincisional cortex increases the risk of a posterior capsule tear during
cortical cleanup. Successful hydrodissection improves surgical efficiency,
reduces the risk of posterior capsular rupture, and in the case of cortical
cleavage by cleaving the cortical attachments, reduces the rate of posterior
capsule opacification.5 Optimizing hydrodissection technique and
instrumentation allows surgeons to reliably achieve these benefits on a
consistent basis.
References
- Fine IH. Cortical cleaving hydrodissection. J Cataract
Refract Surg. 1992;18:508-512.
- Gimbel HV. Hydrodissection and hydrodelineation Int
Ophthalmol Clin.1994;34:73-90.
- Koch DD, Liu JF. Multilamellar hydrodissection in
phacoemulsification and planned extracapsular surgery.J Cataract Refract
Surg.1990;16:559-562.
- Vasavada AR, Singh R, Apple DJ, et al. Effect of
hydrodissection on intraoperative performance: randomized study. J
Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28:1623-1628.
- Peng Q, Apple DJ, Visessook N, et al. Surgical prevention of
posterior capsule opacification. Part 2: enhancement of cortical clean up by
focusing on hydrodissection. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2000;
26:188-197.
- Vasavada AR, Goyal D, Shastri L, Singh R. Corticocapsular
adhesions and their effect during cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract
Surg. 1991;17:866.
- Hurvitz LM. Posterior capsular rupture at hydrodissection
(letter). J Cataract Refract Surg. 1991;17:866.
- Kershner RM. Capsular rupture at hydrodissection (letter).
J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18:423.
- Yeoh R. The pupil snap sign of posterior capsule
rupture with hydrodissection in phacoemulsification (letter).Br J
Ophthalmol. 1996:80:486.
- Ota I, Miyake S, Miyake K. Dislocation of the lens nucleus into
the vitreous cavity after standard hydrodissection.Am J
Ophthalmol. 1996;121:706-708.
- Miyake, K. et al. New classification of capsular block
syndrome.J Cataract Refract Surg. 1998;24: 12301234.
- Blumenthal M, Ashkenazi I, Assia E, Cahane M. Small-incision
manual extracapsular cataract extraction using selective
hydrodissection.Ophthalmic Surg. 1992;23:699-701.
 |